Editorial policy

Clear Training Guide aims to publish clear, careful explanations of training and skill learning. We make the reasoning visible, keep claims proportionate and correct the record when an article is wrong or unclear.

Accuracy and clarity

We check that explanations are internally consistent, define specialised terms and make clear when an idea is an example rather than a universal rule. We avoid unsupported claims about outcomes and do not present general editorial material as professional, safety or regulatory instruction.

Independence and interests

Editorial choices are made for reader relevance and clarity. A partnership does not buy a favourable conclusion or control over unrelated coverage. Where a commercial relationship could matter to a reader, we explain it plainly alongside the relevant material.

Corrections

Readers can use the Contact page to flag a possible error or unclear passage. We review reports, correct material when warranted and make significant changes clear in the article. A correction should improve the reader's understanding, not quietly obscure what changed.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid placements and material created with a partner are clearly labelled so readers can distinguish them from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; where an illustration could be mistaken for a documentary image, we identify it as illustrative.